The Privy Council upheld the decisions of the lower courts that
redemption payments to a Swedish bank made shortly prior to the
collapse of the Weavering fund were voidable preferences that must
be repaid. In doing so, the Privy Council has revisited the
question of whether a fund's net asset value ("NAV")
calculated in accordance with the fund's constitutional
documents can be revised – holding that, in certain limited
circumstances, it can. On the whole, though, any erosion to
investor certainty will likely be around the margins. This is
because it will only be possible to challenge NAV in circumstances
where the fund itself has perpetrated a fraud (internal fraud), as
opposed to having had a fraud perpetrated on it (external fraud,
for example, in the case of the various Madoff feeder funds).
Further, there is no automatic adjustment; legal proceedings must
be brought to rectify the NAV.