In the modern alternative investment landscape, institutional investors, including pension funds, endowments and sovereign wealth funds, increasingly assess governance as a core component of operational due diligence. Investment strategy and performance remain central, but board composition, director capacity and availability, conflicts management, service-provider oversight and the quality of board records are now common areas of review.
From Passive Oversight to Active Stewardship
The shift away from passive directorship reflects investor expectations, evolving market practice and, for CIMA-regulated entities, applicable regulatory standards. Effective fund governance requires a governing body with the collective knowledge, experience and capacity to understand the fund’s asset class, regulatory obligations, service-provider arrangements, material risks and structural mechanics, and to challenge the investment manager and other service providers where appropriate.