Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2018

Fair Value Proceedings: Shanda Games

Campbells
Campbells
Contributor
Campbells

Campbells

The firm Campbells is a full-service offshore law firm with a distinctive set of market-leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Campbells

The CICA held that, if a dissenter holds a minority shareholding, fair value of the dissenter's shares should reflect any applicable minority discount.

Cayman IslandsCorporate/Commercial Law

The Court of Appeal of the Cayman Islands ("CICA") has reversed the Grand Court on an important point of principle for determination of the "fair value" of the shares of a shareholder who dissents from a statutory merger under Part XVI of the Companies Law. See Shanda Games (CICA 12 of 2017, unrep., 6 March 2018).

The CICA held that, if a dissenter holds a minority shareholding, fair value of the dissenter's shares should reflect any applicable minority discount. In terms of the mechanics of carrying out the valuation exercise, the Court is to determine the value of the shares as a proportion of the total value of the company, but that value should then be adjusted to reflect any applicable minority discount and to reflect the rights and obligations attaching to the shares that the dissenter actually possesses. On the facts of the case, the experts appear to have agreed that a minority discount would reduce the value by around 23%, which would still have meant that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from