In a very recent judgment in the wake of the Abraaj
Group fallout, the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands refused
to strike out a just and equitable winding up petition and, in the
process, analysed the effect of a purported "non-petition
clause".
Section 95(2) of the Companies Act provides that:
"The Court shall dismiss a winding up petition or
adjourn the hearing of a winding up petition on the ground that the
petitioner is contractually bound not to present a petition against
the company."
The decision makes clear that, when drafting and negotiating
these types of contractual provisions, the use of generic or
catch-all language should be avoided.
A link to the full judgment is
here.