Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 AUGUST 2018

The Sensor: Legal Insights Into Autonomous Vehicles - August 2018

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In litigation, aviation defendants often face an uphill battle in persuasively educating the Judge, Jury and opposing counsel as to how aircraft fly given the complexity of their systems.

CanadaTransport

In litigation, aviation defendants often face an uphill battle in persuasively educating the Judge, Jury and (on occasion) opposing counsel as to how aircraft fly given the complexity of their systems. This battle could be expected to intensify as Artificial Intelligence ("AI") and automation become more fully imbedded within aircraft and UAVs, losses occur and court cases commence. What is expected to continue, however, is the traditional trend of litigating against manufacturers of aviation autonomous technology based on the product liability allegations of negligent design, manufacture and installation. But as the systems become more complex together with their interface with human interaction, questions arise as to whether manufacturers and end users will be targeted following alleged failures in their "duty to warn" and/or "duty to train" on autonomous technology.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from