Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JUNE 2021

Claim For Road Access Act And Prescriptive Easement To Landlocked Property Dismissed

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

In Balogh v. R.C. Yantha Electric Ltd., 2021 ONCA 266 (CanLII), the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed that the appellants had no right to cross the respondents' land to get to their otherwise landlocked property.

CanadaTransport

In Balogh v. R.C. Yantha Electric Ltd., 2021 ONCA 266 (CanLII), the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed that the appellants had no right to cross the respondents' land to get to their otherwise landlocked property.

In 2014, the appellants purchased a piece of land adjacent to the respondents' property. The appellants' land, on which a lumber mill may have been located in the 19th century, had water access, but the only way to access the land by vehicle was to use what was once a private road (referred to as "the red track"), across the respondents' property. The respondents objected to the appellants' attempt to use the red track, which was overgrown and long in disuse in 2014.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from