Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 OCTOBER 2025

AMF v. Gagnon: The First 'Ripple' In The CSA's Jurisdiction Over Crypto Assets

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Autorité Des Marchés Financiers (AMF) v. Alexandre Gagnon[1], the Quebec Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) adopted a narrow interpretation of "investment contract"...

CanadaTechnology

In Autorité Des Marchés Financiers (AMF) v. Alexandre Gagnon1, the Quebec Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) adopted a narrow interpretation of "investment contract" when considering whether the activities of a crypto "finfluencer" constituted advising in securities and market manipulation. This landmark case adopts the reasoning of Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) vs. Ripple Labs, Inc., Bradley Garlinghouse and Christian A. Larsen2, the first U.S. case to consider whether crypto assets traded in secondary markets could be classified as securities.

The AMF has appealed the decision to the Court of Quebec.

Background

In 2023, the AMF commenced an enforcement investigation of Alexandre Gagnon and his company, "Richie the Bull" (respondents). Richie the Bull offered two types of services: (1) management of crypto asset investments on behalf of clients on the Uniswap decentralized exchange (DEX); and (2) paid subscriptions to private

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from