Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 SEPTEMBER 2009

Taxpayer Prevails - Again - On Beneficial Ownership

The Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in The Queen v. Prevost Car Inc. on February 26, 2009. The CRA’s appeal was denied. The case turned on the meaning of the term “beneficial owner.”

CanadaTax

Appeared in the April 2009 issue of The Bottom Line

The Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in The Queen v. Prevost Car Inc. on February 26, 2009. The CRA's appeal was denied. The case turned on the meaning of the term "beneficial owner."

Prevost Car Inc. ("Prevost") is a resident Canadian corporation that manufactures buses and related products in Quebec and elsewhere throughout North America. In May 1995 the shareholders of Prevost agreed to sell their shares to Volvo Bus Corporation ("Volvo"), a resident of Sweden, and Henlys Group PLC ("Henlys"), a resident of the United Kingdom. Volvo and Henlys entered into a shareholders' subscription agreement on May 3, 1995, in which Volvo undertook to incorporate a Netherlands holding company ("Holdco") and to transfer to it all of the shares that Volvo acquired in Prevost. Fifty-one percent of the shares of Holdco would be owned by Volvo and 49 percent by Henlys.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from