Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2018

CASE STUDY: Rotfleisch & Samulovitch Successful In Late Objection To Derivative Assessment

Ordinarily the Tax Court of Canada is proper jurisdiction for challenging assessments issued under the Canadian Income Tax Act.

CanadaTax

Brief Section 160 Derivative Tax Assessment Overview

Rotfleisch & Samulovitch Professional Corporation was retained by a married couple. The Husband was involved in a number of different businesses and had accumulated an income tax debt of close to $200,000. The Wife occasionally paid the expenses of one of these businesses and the Husband would repay her by depositing cheques into her bank account.

In the course of taking collections action against the Husband, the Canada Revenue Agency (the "CRA") assessed the Wife for significant portion of the Husband's income tax debt under section 160a1of the Canadian Income Tax Act. When a taxpayer makes a transfer of property, including cash, for below fair market value to a non-arm's length person, including spouses, then section 160 allows CRA to assess the non-length person for an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the property and what the non-arm's length person paid the taxpayer for the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from