Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2004

Direct Investment In Canadian Real Estate

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

A U.S. taxpayer (UST) making an investment in Canadian real estate is faced with the decision of direct ownership (or through a U.S. entity) or interposing a Canadian entity. Direct ownership can, in some instances, provide certain Canadian tax advantages as outlined below, compared to using a Canadian corporation.

CanadaStrategy

Article by Kenneth Snider, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Cross Border Taxation - November 2004

A U.S. taxpayer (UST) making an investment in Canadian real estate is faced with the decision of direct ownership (or through a U.S. entity) or interposing a Canadian entity. Direct ownership can, in some instances, provide certain Canadian tax advantages as outlined below, compared to using a Canadian corporation.

Payments by U.S. Taxpayers to Other Non-Residents of Canada

There is a fundamental difference in the Canadian tax treatment of a non-resident depending on whether the income is from carrying on a business or is income from property (that is not business income). First, subject to the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention (US Treaty), a UST that carries on business in Canada for Canadian tax purposes will be subject to tax under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (Act) and will be entitled to claim deductions in computing its Canadian

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from