Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2018

Un différend d'interprétation des documents d'appel d'offres justifie-t-il le refus de contracter?

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

Une interprétation différente concernant de l'étendue des travaux prévus dans les documents d'appel d'offres est chose courante

CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Yann-Julien Chouinard
Yann-Julien Chouinard
Author LinkedIn connections

( Available in French only )

Journal Constructo – 6 juin 2018

Une interprétation différente concernant de l'étendue des travaux prévus dans les documents d'appel d'offres est chose courante. Lorsqu'un tel différend survient, un entrepreneur général est-il justifié de refuser d'octroyer le contrat au plus bas soumissionnaire et de l'accorder soumissionnaire suivant? La Cour a répondu par la positive à cette question dans l'affaire Construction Savite inc. c. Construction Demathieu & Bard (CDB) Inc. 2018 QCCS 1844.

A. LES FAITS

Au terme de l'appel d'offres, l'entrepreneur général Construction Demathieu & Bard (CDB) inc. («CDB») obtient un contrat de la STM pour la réfection de la station de métro Berri-UQAM. À la clôture des soumissions au Bureau des soumissions déposées du Québec («BSDQ»), l'entrepreneur spécialisé en maçonnerie Construction Savite Inc. («Savite») est le plus bas soumissionnaire par un écart de 1 650$ avec Maçonnerie Pro-Conseil inc.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Ontario’s Mandatory Annual Holdback Release Starts In 2027: What Owners And Contractors Need To Know

Starting in 2027, all Ontario project owners with contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026, and most owners with contracts dating back to July 1, 2018, must start releasing statutory holdback to their contractors on an annual basis. This requirement is the latest in a series of construction payment reforms under Ontario’s Construction Act. It replaces the traditional model of retaining holdback until substantial performance. Owners and contractors who fail to comply with the notice and payment timelines face exposure to interest claims, payment disputes, and adjudication proceedings.
CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Article

Quebec’s New Truck Licence Transfer Rules: What Ontario Carriers Need To Do Now

Ontario commercial truck drivers with less than two years of heavy-truck experience must now pass a practical road test administered by Quebec's SAAQ before transferring their licence to operate heavy vehicles in the province. This new requirement follows fatal collisions and an Ontario Auditor General audit that exposed significant gaps in training standards and provider oversight. Carriers operating across the border need to factor these requirements into workforce planning, recruitment timelines, and dis
CanadaTransport
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Article

Nouvelles règles québécoises sur l’échange des permis de conduire de véhicules lourds : quelles sont les mesures à prendre par les transporteurs ontariens

Ontario truck drivers with less than two years of commercial heavy vehicle experience must now pass a practical road test administered by Quebec's SAAQ before exchanging their license to drive commercial heavy vehicles in the province. This new requirement follows a series of collisions involving heavy trucks in Quebec and a May 2026 audit revealing significant gaps in Ontario's training standards and oversight of providers. Carriers operating across the Ontario-Quebec border must now factor these requireme
CanadaTransport
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Article

Canada’s Revised AML Framework: Sweeping Penalties And Compliance Requirements

Bill C-12 has fundamentally transformed Canada's anti-money laundering framework by introducing penalties up to forty times higher than previous levels and expanding compliance obligations across the financial sector. The legislation now requires all reporting entities to enroll with FINTRAC and maintain "reasonably designed, risk-based and effective" compliance programs, while imposing cumulative maximum penalties that can reach 3% of global revenue.
CanadaFinance and Banking
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson