Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2024

Securing Liens: Alberta Court Of King's Bench Confirms Enforcement Timelines When Posting Security

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Lesenko v Wild Rose Ready Mix Ltd, 2024 ABKB 333, the Alberta Court of King's Bench (the "Court") confirmed that when security is paid into court and a lien is removed from the title to property.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

In Lesenko v Wild Rose Ready Mix Ltd, 2024 ABKB 333, the Alberta Court of King's Bench (the "Court") confirmed that when security is paid into court and a lien is removed from the title to property, the lien does not cease to exist as a result of failing to take action to realize the lien within the 180-day time limit set forth in section 43(1) of the Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act, RSA 2000, c P-26.4 (the "PPCLA").

This decision invalidated the 180-day deadline in the template Consent Order used since 2017. As a result, the only way to set a deadline for the lien claimant to commence an action is now a Notice to commence action under section 45 of the PPCLA, which provides a 30-day deadline. Consequently, more Notices to commence action might be issued to enforce proceedings promptly.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from