Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2019

Masters Cannot Use "Enhanced Powers" To Decide Motions For Summary Judgment

In R & V Construction v. Baradaran1 (the "Baradaran Decision"), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled that masters cannot weigh evidence, assess credibility, or draw reasonable inferences when determining motions for summary judgment.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Introduction

In R & V Construction v. Baradaran1 (the "Baradaran Decision"), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled that masters cannot weigh evidence, assess credibility, or draw reasonable inferences when determining motions for summary judgment. Parties to construction litigation should be mindful of the Baradaran Decision and its implications.

Summary Judgment and Construction Litigation

A motion for summary judgment is a procedure that allows a judge or master to make a final determination of a claim or defence by way of a motion, rather than a full trial. When properly used, motions for summary judgment can reduce the time required to complete the litigation process, reduce the costs associated with trial, and save judicial resources.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from