Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2015

Limitation of Liability Clauses: Are They Enforceable and Effective?

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

One of the issues in the case was whether Mrs. Swift was bound by the contractual limitation clause, given that she had not signed the contract.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

A frequent issue raised by design consultants is the extent to which they can limit liability for claims through limitation of liability clauses. Although such clauses are enforceable, recent case law raises questions as to their practical effectiveness.

Enforceability of Limitation of Liability Clauses

Canadian courts have allowed parties to limit liability for claims arising in either contract or tort through appropriately drafted exclusion or limitation of liability clauses: Edgeworth Construction Ltd. v. N.D. Lea & Associates Ltd., 1993 CanLII 67 (SCC). Such clauses may limit a design consultant's liability as follows: (1) to the value of the consultant's fee for services rendered; (2) to a percentage of the fee charged for services rendered; (3) to a percentage of the construction cost of the work; (4) to the amount of the errors and omissions coverage in effect at the time; or (5) to a specified dollar amount. The latter two types are most commonly used.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from