Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2024

Let Me Be Direct: Pleading Admissions As Evidence Of A Direct Contract

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The trial decision in Sjostrom Sheet Metal Ltd. v. Geo A. Kelson Company Limited contains several insights for parties navigating disputes arising from distressed construction projects.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

The trial decision in Sjostrom Sheet Metal Ltd. v. Geo A. Kelson Company Limited1 contains several insights for parties navigating disputes arising from distressed construction projects.

In Sjostrom, the Ontario Superior Court granted relief to an unpaid subcontractor, denied relief to a contractor for failure to provide timely notice of default, and dismissed a sub-subcontractor's lien claim due to the failure to prove labour costs.

In arriving at its decision, the court overcame a number of evidentiary hurdles to find a valid and unwritten direct contract between a subcontractor and a sub-sub-subcontractor. The court relied on admissions in the subcontractor's own pleadings to support its finding. The court also reviewed other evidentiary and notice issues applicable to a broad range of projects.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from