Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2008

Lender Non-Disturbance Agreements – Pitfalls And Traps

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The interplay between leases and mortgages is well settled at common law.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Copyright 2008, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Real Estate Leasing, April, 2008

The interplay between leases and mortgages is well settled at common law. Thus, a tenant whose lease has priority over a mortgage is bound by the lease if the mortgagee (lender) enters into possession. At the same time, the mortgagee in possession must honour the lease and cannot oust the tenant. However, a tenant under a lease that is subordinate to a mortgage is not bound by its lease if the mortgagee enters into possession and, accordingly, the tenant may vacate the premises rather than recognize the mortgagee as its landlord. Correspondingly, where the lease is subordinate to the mortgage, the mortgagee is not bound to the lease and may remove the tenant.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from