Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2016

Even The Kitchen Sink?

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

A recent decision of the Superior Court of Ontario should serve as a reminder that an owner's right to mediation and/or arbitration under section 132 of the Condominium Act (Ontario) is not absolute.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

York Condominium Corp. No. 78 v. Stein, 2016 ONSC 1837 is a recent decision of the Superior Court of Ontario which should serve as a reminder that an owner's right to mediation and/or arbitration under section 132 of the Condominium Act (Ontario) (the "Act") is not absolute. In some circumstances, a corporation will be well within its rights to bring an application before a court without attempting alternative forms of dispute resolution. 

In this case, York Condominium Corp. No. 78 ("YCC 78") received complaints from the unit owner, Stein, of exterior water penetration into her unit. Upon investigation, YCC 78 discovered that Stein had carried out extensive renovations to the unit and common elements throughout her unit. She had not sought the permission of the corporation for these modifications, as required by the Act or the condominium governing documents.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from