Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2022

Case Of Inflated Builders' Lien Claim

Arecent decision from the B.C. Supreme Court effectively provides a roadmap for what not to do when a dispute between a subcontractor and a general contractor arises on a commercial construction project.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Arecent decision1 from the B.C. Supreme Court effectively provides a roadmap for what not to do when a dispute between a subcontractor and a general contractor arises on a commercial construction project. It provides a cautionary tale for how matters can spiral out of control and result in substantial and significant legal fees and damages being incurred when a contractual dispute is not addressed in a timely and reasonable manner.

The subcontractor in this case, a steel stud framing and drywall subcontractor on a residential condominium project, walked off the job after a payment dispute. It then issued bogus invoices and filed an inflated claim of builders' lien on title to the project. It proceeded to pursue its inflated claims through an eight day trial only to concede in closing argument that its inflated invoices were not in fact what had been agreed between the parties as the amount owing at the relevant time.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from