Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 OCTOBER 2015

Can You Put Lipstick On A Pig And Call It Rent?

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Until recently, there has been some confusion over the limitation period in respect of rent.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Until recently, there has been some confusion over the limitation period in respect of rent. This is largely due to the fact that there are two references to the term "rent" in the Real Property Limitations Act (with one section referring to a ten-year limitation period1 and the other section referring to a six year limitation period2), which governs claims for rent. This differs from the Limitations Act which governs damages claims (and has a limitation period of two years).

In Pickering Square Inc. v. Trillium College Inc.3, the Court was called upon to determine the effect of a provision in a lease which deemed all payments under that lease as "rent" (and, by implication, therefore subject to either a six or ten year limitation period in accordance with the Real Property Limitations Act). In particular, the Landlord's claim was for liquidated damages, as was permitted under the lease, for each day on which the tenant did not carry on business at the leased

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from