Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MARCH 2012

Aboriginal Law @ Gowlings: March 22, 2012 - Newsflash

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

On January 31, 2012, the Yukon Territory Supreme Court issued its judgment in the first phase of a trial in which it was asked to determine whether terms and conditions set out in the June 23, 1870, Rupert’s Land and North-western Territory Order ("1870 Order") give rise to a justiciable right requiring the Crown to negotiate settlement of First Nations land claims in the Yukon, and if so, whether the Crown’s obligations were of a fiduciary nature.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Edited by Maxime Faille

In this issue:

  • Yukon Court determines Crown does not owe fiduciary obligation to negotiate settlements of land claims
  • Federal Court denies Attawapiskat First Nation's Request for an Interlocutory Injunction
  • Alberta Court Of Appeal Grants Alberta Métis Hunter Leave To Appeal Wildlife Offences
  • Ontario Superior Court Grants Injunction And Orders Project Proponent To Consult
  • CRA Provides Position On The Tax Treatment of Interest Income Earned by Status Indians and Bands

Yukon Court determines Crown does not owe fiduciary obligation to negotiate settlements of land claims

By: Scott A. Smith

Ross River Dena Council v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 YKSC 4

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from