Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JULY 2012

The Tort Of Snooping: Intrusion Upon Seclusion

In January, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed the existence of a new common law right of action for breach of privacy in Jones v. Tsige.

CanadaPrivacy
John Finnigan
John Finnigan
Jessica Prince
Jessica Prince

In January, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed the existence of a new common law right of action for breach of privacy in Jones v. Tsige.1 This potentially wide-ranging new tort is called "intrusion upon seclusion".

The case in question involved two individuals: Sandra Jones ("Jones") and Winnie Tsige ("Tsige"). Both women worked at the Bank of Montreal, but had never met. At the time of the intrusion, Tsige was dating Jones' ex-husband. Contrary to bank policy, Tsige had been surreptitiously looking at Jones' banking records. She had done so at least 174 times over a four-year period. When Jones discovered this invasion of her privacy, she advised her employer. As a result of an internal investigation, Tsige admitted to it. She also admitted that she had no legitimate reason for viewing the records.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from