Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2014

Canada’s Supreme Court Sends Strong Message On Internet Privacy In R v Spencer

The Supreme Court of Canada decided that when police demand subscriber information held by ISPs be provided without a warrant, it constitutes a search.

CanadaPrivacy

The Supreme Court of Canada decided late last week in R v Spencer1 that when police demand basic subscriber information held by telecom service providers and ISPs be provided without a warrant, such activity constitutes a search and police cannot rely upon their general investigative powers under s. 487.014 of the Criminal Code or the lawful authority exception provided in s. 7(3)(c.1)(ii) of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act as authorizing such disclosure.

Writing for the court, Justice Cromwell stated that, "Disclosure of this information will often amount to the identification of a user with intimate or sensitive activities being carried out online, usually on the understanding that these activities would be anonymous. A request by a police officer that an ISP voluntarily disclose such information amounts to a search." As a result, police will now require a warrant to obtain subscriber information (except in exigent circumstances)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from