Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2014

Website Terms And Conditions: What Constitutes Acceptance? – A Recent U.S. Case Casts Doubt

A recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision is a reminder to any of us seeking to impose contractual terms on our website users and online customers.

CanadaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

A recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision (Ninth Circuit, August 18, 2014) is a reminder to any of us seeking to impose contractual terms on our website users and online customers.  Nguyen sued Barnes & Noble in federal court, but Barnes & Noble was seeking to enforce the arbitration clause in their website terms and conditions, to move the proceedings out of the court.

The case arose from the liquidation by Barnes & Noble of its inventory of discontinued HP "Touchpad" tablets, which were an unsuccessful competitor to the iPad.

Barnes & Noble advertised the fire sale of Touchpads at a heavily discounted price.  Nguyen acted quickly and purchased two units on their website and received an email confirming the transaction.  But the following day he received another email from Barnes & Noble informing him that his order had been cancelled due to unexpectedly high demand.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from