Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 DECEMBER 2017

No Interlocutory Injunction—How About "Terms" Instead?

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Some would say keeping a software license alive by an injunction is like requiring specific performance of a contract – something courts don't like to do.

CanadaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Some would say keeping a software license alive by an injunction is like requiring specific performance of a contract – something courts don't like to do. However, a recent Ontario decision appears to have done about just that, by relying on its discretion to grant "terms" according to Ontario Rule 37.13(1) in extending an interim injunction for six months, despite the plaintiff failing to justify its request for an interlocutory injunction to trial.

In this software contract dispute, the Plaintiff ("ProPurchaser") sought to convert an interim injunction into an interlocutory injunction that would require the Defendants ("Wifidelity") to provide access to its software, until trial. Without access, the Plaintiff said it would be out of business.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from