Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 AUGUST 2022

What You Need To Know About The Courts' Varying Approaches To Appealing Commercial Arbitration Awards

Canadian appeal courts adopt a deferential posture toward commercial arbitration awards. This approach protects the policy underlying Ontario's Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c.17 (the "Act")...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Canadian appeal courts adopt a deferential posture toward commercial arbitration awards.

This approach protects the policy underlying Ontario's Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c.17 (the "Act"), which is to promote the resolution of disputes between sophisticated commercial parties without Court interference.

A recent conflict has emerged in Ontario case law, however, about which standards of review (that is, the grammar by which Courts analyze the merits of an arbitral award) apply.

Two 2022 decisions of the Ontario Superior Court, Serbcan Inc. v. National Trust Co., 2022 ONSC 2644, and D Lands Inc. v. KS Victoria and King Inc., 2022 ONSC 1029, suggest fundamentally different approaches to the standard of review applicable to arbitration orders. Which approach will ultimately govern remains unresolved. The issue is ripe for appellate intervention.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from