Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 DECEMBER 2019

Use A Competitor To Defend A Professional

In Sangha v Sintra Engineering Inc., 2019 ABQB 94, Master Robertson dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the engineering company he formally retained to provide an expert opinion related to a motor vehicle accident ...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Sangha v Sintra Engineering Inc., 2019 ABQB 94, Master Robertson dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the engineering company he formally retained to provide an expert opinion related to a motor vehicle accident that occurred on October 28, 2002.

The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident on October 28, 2002 where the unknown driver of a vehicle impacted the plaintiff, causing him to leave the road, spin in the median, and impact a sign. The plaintiff issued a lawsuit against the Administrator of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act in 2004. As part of prosecuting that claim, the plaintiff embarked upon obtaining two accident reconstruction reports in 2003 and 2009. He then proceeded to retain Sintra Engineering to provide a biomechanical report in 2013. The retainer letter specifically provided a mutual termination clause to be exercised by either party at any time. Sintra accepted the assignment for a biomechanical report and proceeded with their

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from