Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 AUGUST 2013

Unlawful Conduct Conspiracy: HSBC Bank Canada v Fuss

The Alberta Court of Appeal recently considered a case concerning the tort of unlawful conspiracy in HSBC Bank Canada v Fuss, 2013 ABCA 235.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Alberta Court of Appeal recently considered a case concerning the tort of unlawful conspiracy in HSBC Bank Canada v Fuss, 2013 ABCA 235. After applying the five elements of the tort as set out in Agribrands Purina Canada Inc v Kasamekas, 2011 ONCA 460 (Agribrands), the trial judge awarded damages in favour of the respondent, HSBC Bank Canada (HSBC), in the sum of $1,761,901.14. The appellants, David Fuss (Fuss) and his wife, Rhonda Thuna (Thuna), appealed the trial judge's decision.  

Background

82836 Alberta Ltd. (828) was a wholesale and retail distributor of satellite systems and electronics. In 2001 HSBC provided 828 with financing through an operating line of credit, and pursuant to a GSA executed in HSBC's favour, any money collected or received by 828 was subject to a trust. At that time Cameron Kendrick (Kendrick) was 828's only director and shareholder. Fuss was a director of two Ontario corporations that were suppliers of 828, Ariza Technology Inc.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from