Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MAY 2012

Uncommonly Individual "Common Issue" Certified

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

Can a common issue really be "common" when its resolution requires an individual investigation vis-a-vis every class member in a class action? This is the question we are left with following the certification of "French and Karas v Smith and Stephenson" as a class proceeding.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Can a common issue really be "common" when its resolution requires an individual investigation vis-a-vis every class member in a class action? This is the question we are left with following the certification of French and Karas v Smith and Stephenson1 as a class proceeding.

The action

The named defendants in this matter were two registered investment advisors, Karas and Stephenson, their registered dealer and related companies.

The plaintiff class was comprised of investor clients of Karas and Stephenson and individuals who participated in what the plaintiffs called the "Leveraging Scheme."

The Leveraging Scheme was an investment strategy. Under the Leveraging Scheme, investors borrowed money that they then invested in mutual funds or segregated funds.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from