Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2019

Uber Decision Calls Into Question Arbitration Clauses In Commercial Agreements

It is easy to see how termination entitlements are requirements that apply to an employment for the benefit of an employee.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The news media has widely reported the Ontario Court of Appeal's January 3, 2019 decision allowing a class-action by Uber drivers to proceed. The decision does not answer the question of whether Uber (and UberEATS) drivers should be considered employees or independent contractors (a conclusion that could have wide-ranging implications for employers that rely on independent contractor agreements). However, one aspect of the decision may have an immediate impact on employers in Ontario – the Court of Appeal's finding that Uber's arbitration clause amounted to an unlawful "contracting out" of Ontario's Employment Standards Act, 2000 (the "ESA").

Under section 5(1) of the ESA, any clause in an employment agreement that contracts out of or waives an "employment standard" is unenforceable. The ESA defines "Employment standards" as being "a requirement or prohibition [...] that applies to an employer for the benefit of an employee".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from