Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JULY 2013

This Week At The SCC (26/07/2013)

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The Supreme Court of Canada released one decision this week of interest to Canadian businesses and professions.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court of Canada released one decision this week of interest to Canadian businesses and professions.

In Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie‑Britannique v. British Columbia, 2013 SCC 42, Wagner J. for the majority held that documents submitted to the British Columbia courts for use in civil proceedings (in this case, affidavit exhibits) must either be in English, or accompanied by an English translation.  Wagner J. based his judgment not only upon Rule 22-3 of the B.C. Supreme Court Civil Rules (which provides that "every document prepared for use in the court must be in the English language"), but also upon a 1731 English statute that he found was received into British Columbia law under the s. 2 of the B.C. Law and Equity Act.  The 1731 statute requires that all "proceedings" – including therefore the taking and admission of evidence – be in English.  Wagner J. held that this conclusion was not inconsistent with Charter values, since the Charter d

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from