Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JUNE 2013

The Second Opinion: Loss Of Chance – A Lost Cause In Quebec

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In a recent case the Quebec Court of Appeal has confirmed that the theory of loss of chance or increase of risk does not apply to establish causation under the law of Quebec.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Lévesque v. Hudon, 2013 QCCA 920, the Quebec Court of Appeal has confirmed that the theory of loss of chance or increase of risk does not apply to establish causation under the law of Quebec.

The plaintiff sued a physician for injury resulting from a delayed diagnosis by the physician which prevented treatment on a timely basis. The Superior Court decision held that each day was crucial to the potential benefits of treatment. Accordingly, the first instance judge held that a fault causing a delay of 48 hours in the diagnosis and treatment of the patient created a factual presumption of causation between the fault and injuries suffered. The court stated that timely treatment would have given the patient a 70% chance of full recovery. Further, the fault causing a delay in diagnosis and treatment deprived the patient of 60% of the chance of a full recovery. Accordingly, the Superior Court awarded the patient compensation for 42% of the damages suffered.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from