Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 SEPTEMBER 2013

The Second Opinion: Interest Is Not Interest … When It Is A Penalty

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In a recent case, a construction contract specified a late payment interest rate of 24% per annum and a legal/collection fees charge of 20% on the amount due.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Diamantopoulos v. Construction Dompat Inc., 2013 QCCA 929, a construction contract specified a late payment interest rate of 24% per annum and a legal/collection fees charge of  20% on the amount due. The Québec Court of Appeal characterized these clauses jointly as "penal", excessive and abusive, and reduced the charges to a single, global interest rate of 15%. The court exercised its discretion under article 1623 C.C.Q. which permits judicial reduction if the amount in a penalty or liquidated damages clause is abusive. It is noteworthy that the contract in issue was expressly held not to be a consumer contract or adhesion contract which would have given the court other revision powers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from