Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2017

The Mauritius Convention On Transparency: The Potential Impact On Canadian Investors

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Investor-state arbitration has often come with the expectation that proceedings will remain private and confidential, resulting in the greater possibility of a de-politicized and evidence-based mechanism of dispute resolution.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

BACKGROUND

Investor-state arbitration has often come with the expectation that proceedings will remain private and confidential, resulting in the greater possibility of a de-politicized and evidence-based mechanism of dispute resolution. This method of dispute resolution is relevant today more than ever, as the forces of globalization drive increased foreign direct investment. Bilateral and multilateral investment treaties and contracts cross borders, impacting governments, foreign investors, citizens, and the environment. The confidential nature of investor-state arbitration is not universally applied, however, and it is often one of the criticisms lodged against the Investor-State Dispute Settlement ("ISDS") regime.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from