Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2015

The Last Word: When Can A Party File Further Affidavit Evidence After Cross-Examination

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

The decision of Perell J in Shah v. LG Chem, 2015 ONSC 776, addresses the topic of when a party should be granted leave of the court, under Rule 39.02(2), to deliver further affidavit evidence after cross-examination.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The decision of Perell J in Shah v. LG Chem, 2015 ONSC 776, addresses the topic of when a party should be granted leave of the court, under Rule 39.02(2), to deliver further affidavit evidence after cross-examination.

The plaintiffs commenced a class action law suit on behalf of persons in Canada who purchased lithium ion batteries or products containing these batteries. The plaintiffs alleged that a host of defendants had conspired to fix the prices of the batteries in a specific time period.

The plaintiffs brought a certification motion and a group of defendants (the "NEC defendants") brought a motion to challenge the jurisdiction of the Court (the NEC defendants have head offices in Japan).  The NEC defendants delivered an affidavit sworn by Mr. Narita which denied that the NEC defendants sold the batteries at issue in Canada.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from