Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2014

The Expanding Role Of Summary Judgment

In Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, the Supreme Court of Canada considered Ontario’s civil procedure rules 20.04(2.1) and (2.2).

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, the Supreme Court of Canada considered Ontario's civil procedure rules 20.04(2.1) and (2.2). These rules were implemented in 2010 to allow judges hearing an application for summary judgment to weigh evidence, evaluate the credibility of such evidence, and draw any reasonable inference from the evidence accepted. A judge also has the discretion to hear oral evidence from the parties.

Justice Karakatsanis, writing for a unanimous Court, described the necessity of change in civil procedure in order to ensure access to civil justice, saying:

Increasingly, there is recognition that a culture shift is required in order to create an environment promoting timely and affordable access to the civil justice system. This shift entails simplifying pre-trial procedures and moving the emphasis away from the conventional trial in favour of proportional procedures tailored to the needs of the particular case. The balance between procedure and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from