Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JUNE 2019

The Application Of Rule 49 Cost Consequences In Expropriation Cases: Shergar v Windsor

When land is expropriated, the owner whose land is taken is entitled to be compensated for the fair market value of the land taken, the damage to the remainder of the land if only part of the land was taken, as well as other "disturbance

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

When land is expropriated, the owner whose land is taken is entitled to be compensated for the fair market value of the land taken, the damage to the remainder of the land if only part of the land was taken, as well as other "disturbance" damages that result from the expropriation and the project or works for which the land was taken. The governing legislation, the Expropriations Act, helps to ensure that an expropriated owner can claim compensation without being at a disadvantage. For example, s. 25 of the Act requires the expropriating authority to make an offer of compensation before taking possession of the land (the "Section 25 Offer"); that offer can be accepted by the owner without prejudice to the right to claim more compensation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from