Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2024

Test Drive Crashes: Who Is Liable?

The recently released decision of the Court of Appeal in Harris Victoria Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Ltd. v. Ward, 2023 BCCA 478, sheds light on the complexities surrounding vehicle ownership and liability.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case citation: Harris v. Victoria Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Ltd., 2023 BCCA 478

The recently released decision of the Court of Appeal in Harris Victoria Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Ltd. v. Ward, 2023 BCCA 478, sheds light on the complexities surrounding vehicle ownership and liability. One of the pivotal issues was the ownership of the vehicle and the related consent, express or implied, at the time of the accident. The dealership argued that it had entered into a binding contract of sale such that it was no longer the owner.

The case concerned whether 'ownership' rested with the dealership which was the legal owner of the vehicle, or the customer who had taken physical possession of the vehicle to do a 10-day test drive. The dealership provided the vehicle to the customer in the hopes that upon the expiry of the 10-day period they would purchase the vehicle.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from