Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2025

Supreme Court Finds That Aboriginal Claims With Overlapping Aspects Not Abuse Of Process

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Saskatchewan (Environment) v. Métis Nation – Saskatchewan, 2025 SCC 4 clarifies that Aboriginal peoples are free to challenge specific Crown decisions...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Saskatchewan (Environment) v. Métis Nation – Saskatchewan, 2025 SCC 4 clarifies that Aboriginal peoples are free to challenge specific Crown decisions impacting their asserted rights on the basis of failed Crown consultation, even if a broader court action looking to substantively establish the rights at issue remains unresolved, or even in a procedurally dormant state. In turn, the Crown cannot avoid consultation regarding asserted title or rights simply because no final judicial decision on those title or rights has been rendered.

The procedural guidance provided in this decision is consistent with the Supreme Court's existing jurisprudence, which holds that the duty to consult is a mechanism intended to operate in the time frame between the assertion and final determination of claims. A substantive claim relating to the specific asserted rights at issue therefore need not be brought, let alone successfully concluded,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from