Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2014

Striking Claims For Long Delay: Last-Ditch Efforts Will Not Cut It

The Court emphasized that the purpose of the Rules of Court are to promote efficiency, proportionality and economy.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Nash v Snow, 2014 ABQB 355, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench considered an application under Rule 4.33 to determine whether a settlement letter, sent nine weeks after the formal "drop-dead" date, and a last-minute "notice to admit facts" ("NTA") application had significantly advanced the court action that otherwise remained idle for over four years. Rule 4.33 permits a party to apply to have a lawsuit dismissed on the basis that there has not been a "significant advance" in the action for over three years.

Steps to Advance Court Action Must Satisfy Qualitative Criteria

The Court emphasized that the purpose of the Rules of Court are to promote efficiency, proportionality and economy. Where a plaintiff seeks to use publicly funded court resources, but does not diligently pursue their action, then the defendant is free to have the lawsuit struck. Madam Justice Topolniski noted that in order to advance an action, the step taken must be substantial, solid and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from