Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JANUARY 2019

Speeding And Alcohol Consumption Do Not Necessarily Equal Negligence

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In the Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Smith v. Safranyos, 2018 ONCA 760, the Court considered an appeal from the trial decision of a claim arising from a serious car accident.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Smith v. Safranyos, 2018 ONCA 760, the Court considered an appeal from the trial decision of a claim arising from a serious car accident.

The plaintiffs were passengers in a car travelling westbound on Green Mountain Road in the City of Hamilton. The driver of the car, Safranyos, failed to stop fully at the stop sign and proceeded to make a left turn across two northbound lanes. The co-defendant, McHugh, was travelling northbound and struck the driver's side of the Safranyos car. The City of Hamilton was added as a defendant on the theory that there was a design defect in the construction of the intersection.

The trial judge apportioned 50% of liability to Safranyos, 25% to the City and 25% to McHugh.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from