Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 NOVEMBER 2011

Saskatchewan Court Of Appeal Rejects Ragoonanan Principle

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In a recent decision with potentially far-reaching consequences – Red Seal – the Saskatchewan ​Court of Appeal has rejected the so-called "Ragoonanan" principle applicable to class actions.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent decision with potentially far-reaching consequences – Red Seal – the Saskatchewan ​Court of Appeal has rejected the so-called "Ragoonanan" principle applicable to class actions. The Ragoonanan principle, which derives from an Ontario case of the same name, requires that for each defendant named in a putative class action, there must be at least one representative plaintiff with a cause of action against it.

Decision

The decision in Red Seal was released alongside two other judgments in the same putative class action: Alves and Roussy. The action involved allegations that the defendant tour companies sold the plaintiffs vacation packages in Cuba, with knowledge that the Cuban resorts could not supply basic water amenities. The defendants were alleged to be liable for failing to take reasonable care in the selection of the Cuban resorts, and selling the tour packages without disclosing the water problems.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from