Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2014

Proposed Class Action Against Law Firm Not Certified

A recent decision suggest that clients are unlikely to succeed in certifying class actions against their former lawyers based on the terms of their retainer agreements.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

LawPro can breathe a sigh of relief – a recent decision suggest that clients are unlikely to succeed in certifying class actions against their former lawyers based on the terms of their retainer agreements. Just as contracts contain individual issues, retainer agreements between lawyers and their clients are fundamentally individual in nature. In Hodge v. Neinstein, Justice Perell refused to certify a class proceeding challenging a law firm's contingency fee agreements because of the lack of common issues (and abundance of individual issues) present when analyzing multiple retainer agreements.

Background

The plaintiff, Cassie Hodge, retained a lawyer to pursue her personal injury claims following a motor vehicle accident. Under their contingency fee agreement, the legal fees would be 25% of the damages recovered plus partial indemnity costs and disbursements. The plaintiff settled her tort claim for $150,000, which her lawyer apportioned $50,000 to costs and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from