Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 DECEMBER 2024

No Space For Error: Invalid Indemnity Claim In Asset Transaction Failed To Follow Notice Terms

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

The latest dispute in the asset deal between Spacebridge Inc. and Baylin Technologies Inc. is a stark warning to anyone delivering a notice of indemnification claim against funds held in escrow.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The latest dispute in the asset deal between Spacebridge Inc. and Baylin Technologies Inc.1 is a stark warning to anyone delivering a notice of indemnification claim against funds held in escrow.

In SpaceBridge Inc v Baylin Technologies Inc, 2024 ONCA 871, the Court of Appeal for Ontario upheld a strict interpretation of the notice requirements under the indemnification and escrow provisions in an Asset Purchase Agreement (APA) and Escrow Agreement. Written notice of Baylin's indemnity claim, sent to the Escrow Agent on time but by registered mail rather than courier, did not comply with the parties' agreement and was found to be invalid. The consequence was severe. Having failed to validly deliver its indemnity claim to the Escrow Agent, Baylin was ordered to return its over $1.8 million claim in full, with interest.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from