Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2024

No "Magic Words" Required: Supreme Court Of Canada Holds Exclusion Clauses Released Seller From Implied Statutory Conditions

On May 31, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v. Pine Valley Enterprises Inc., 2024 SCC 20, which clarifies how contractual exclusion clauses...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On May 31, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v. Pine Valley Enterprises Inc., 2024 SCC 20, which clarifies how contractual exclusion clauses are to be interpreted and when they can release a seller from implied conditions under Ontario's Sale of Goods Act(the “SGA”).

In a 6-1 decision, penned by Justice Martin, the Supreme Court held the relevant exclusion clauses in the parties' written contract were valid and negated the defendant's liability under a condition implied by the SGA  that, under an agreement to sell goods by way of a “sale by description”, the goods delivered must correspond with the description given.

In clarifying the test for enforcing exclusion clauses in a sale of goods contract, the Supreme Court held that rigid, formulaic analyses should be avoided and that a clause does not need to include any particular “magic words” to be enforced. The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from