Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2024

Navigating Lien Expiry And Compliance With Trial-Related Timelines Under The Builders' Lien Act In Saskatchewan

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

The Saskatchewan Court of King's Bench decision in Singh v George Development Corp., 2023 SKKB 36, confirms that the discharge of a lien, by payment of the claim amount into court...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Saskatchewan Court of King's Bench decision in Singh v George Development Corp., 2023 SKKB 36, confirms that the discharge of a lien, by payment of the claim amount into court, does not negate the statutory obligation of a lien claimant to move to trial, an action seeking to realize the lien, within two years of the action's commencement.

The action arose from a dispute over the construction of a hotel on land owned by a public institution. Two contractors, George Development Corp. and Meridian Development Corp., applied to discharge the liens registered by two subcontractors, Singh and OM Drywall, and to payout the funds they had deposited with the Court in order to discharge the liens against the land. Further to s. 56 of the Builder's Lien Act (the "Act"), the liens had become a charge against the funds paid into court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from