Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 APRIL 2026

Millhouse Farms: How Using Leased Equipment Bound The Borrower Without A Signed Certificate Of Acceptance

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

When a borrower takes possession of leased farm equipment, uses it for a full harvest season, and makes payments—but never signs the certificate of acceptance—can the lease still be enforced? The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal addressed this exact question in Millhouse Farms Inc. v De Lage Landen Financial Services Canada Inc., reaffirming that acceptance by conduct can complete a contract even when formal paperwork remains incomplete.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

When a borrower never signs the certificate of acceptance, can you still enforce the lease if they've taken the equipment, used it for a season, and made payments? That's exactly the scenario the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal confronted in Millhouse Farms Inc. v De Lage Landen Financial Services Canada Inc., 2026 SKCA 21 ("Millhouse Farms"). This dispute over a farming equipment lease reaffirmed core principles of contract formation under Saskatchewan Law.

For commercial lenders and equipment lessors, the decision is a useful reminder that acceptance by conduct can complete a contract even when the paperwork is incomplete, and that courts will look at what the parties actually did, not just what they signed, when enforceability is challenged.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from