Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2013

Mathieson v. Scotia Capital Inc., 2008 CanLII 45409 (ONSC)

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

A discussion on a recent case where the plaintiff argued that e-mails between 8 identified principals of the employer which mentioned his name should be produced.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This matter involved the termination of an employee and allegations of bad faith against the former employer. The plaintiff argued that e-mails between 8 identified principals of the employer which mentioned his name should be produced. In answering an undertaking, the defendant searched the e-mails of those 8 principals for the plaintiff's name, resulting in 25,000 hits. The defendant produced 27 of those e-mails, while the plaintiff wanted all 25,000.

Master Sproat dismissed the motion and awarded $1500 in costs to the defendant. The Master held that the rules and principles applicable to electronic discovery did not apply since all of the documents in dispute could be printed in hard copy.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from