Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JANUARY 2025

Lochan v. Binance Holdings Limited

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The Appellant Binance Holdings Limited ("Binance") operated the world's largest cryptocurrency trading platform. Between 2019 and early 2022, it sold cryptocurrency derivatives to Canadians through its website.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Appeal upheld dismissal of stay in favour of arbitration based on unconscionability and public policy.

Background

The Appellant Binance Holdings Limited ("Binance") operated the world's largest cryptocurrency trading platform. Between 2019 and early 2022, it sold cryptocurrency derivatives to Canadians through its website. That website boasted that users could create an account in "under 30 seconds". This claim was made even though Binance's users could not access the platform without first accepting roughly 50 pages of terms, including an arbitration agreement.

The Respondents (collectively "Lochan"), in their capacity as representative plaintiffs, commenced a proposed class action against Binance under section 133 of the Ontario Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5. Section 133 provides a right of action for rescission or damages against a company selling securities that fails to file or deliver a prospectus. In the decision below, the Court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from