Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 APRIL 2026

Let’s Be Practical - Ontario Court Of Appeal Endorses Practical, Common Sense Approach To Contractual Interpretation

Project Freeway Inc (“PF”) sold its shares in a group of companies to ABC Technologies Inc. (“ABC”) for 165 million dollars. US26 million dollars of the purchase price was to be paid by way of an earn out if ABC hit certain performance targets.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Project Freeway Inc (“PF”) sold its shares in a group of companies to ABC Technologies Inc. (“ABC”) for 165 million dollars.  US26 million dollars of the purchase price was to be paid by way of an earn out if ABC hit certain performance targets. 

A dispute arose between PF and ABC whether the earn out provision had been triggered.  

PF asserted that a sale-leaseback arrangement entered into by ABC with a third-party meant the earn out was immediately payable because ABC had sold a “material portion of the assets” of the business purchased.  ABC disagreed. ABC asserted that the impugned transaction did not constitute such a sale.

The issue was tried by Justice Jana Steele of the Superior Court of Justice. Justice Steele dismissed PF’s claim. PF appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal (“OCA”).  

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from