Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2014

Landmark Supreme Court Decision On Summary Judgment: Hryniak V Mauldin

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

On January 24th, 2014, the Supreme Court released its much anticipated decision in Hryniak v Mauldin.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On January 24th, 2014, the Supreme Court released its much anticipated decision in Hryniak v Mauldin. In dismissing the appeal, the Supreme Court provided guidance on the interpretation of Ontario's recently amended summary judgment rule (Rule 20 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure) and introduced a new test for summary judgment. In short, this decision will make it easier for litigants to obtain a summary judgment disposition without going to trial.

Much of the unanimous decision, written by Justice Karakatsanis, consists of commentary regarding the need for a culture shift in the Canadian legal landscape that places a premium on efficiency, affordability, and access to justice. The Supreme Court used this decision as an opportunity to reflect on the way in which summary judgment motions can be used as a tool to facilitate this culture shift. In so doing, the Supreme Court introduced significant changes to the current summary judgment regime. Some

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from